Han Han: "Rates of income than the" one-vote veto assessment officials may wish to
Abstract: If a transaction as an important political achievements, the implementation of clear objectives accountability, will result in a powerful spur to the role of officials.
Recently, Wenzhou City, the introduction of measures for the first time, "Price Ratio" as a "hard" included in the counties (cities, districts) focus on assessing project performance, scores accounted for 5 points, as the basis of official performance testing (Jan. 22, "Zhejiang Daily").
last year, soaring house prices, the central government introduced control measures for 3 times, but the housing prices do not appear to be curbed, in recent months, some signs of urban housing prices rise reproduction. In this regard, the authorities said, "the most stringent price regulation" will continue this year.
However, inflation pressures and dynamic local government land revenue under the double attack, "the most stringent price regulation," how much space to play, but also play a role in how much restraint is undoubtedly widespread public concern The. To curb soaring housing prices, in addition to administrative measures other than the economy, is there other way?
the "price earnings ratio" into the official performance evaluation, control prices as a "political means", in fact, worth trying.
we all know, desperate local officials dare even behind the high prices, in addition to the financial lure of the land and, more importantly, high prices push up the local GDP, manufacturing for government officials to considerable performance, bringing beautiful future. Once the "price earnings ratio," included in the performance evaluation, the interest may be rewritten, if continued obsession with local officials and land economy at high prices, his official post will be at risk.
"Price Ratio," included in the incentives for performance evaluation of the extent of the examples from the energy savings we can glimpse or two. Late last year, the number of energy saving and emission reduction targets for the completion of local residents to restrict electricity, stop production, this lead to public criticism. However, despite this absurd, but the side also reflects the power of performance evaluation. If a transaction as an important political achievements, the implementation of clear objectives accountability, will result in a powerful spur to the role of officials. In order to secure official hat, and then a big temptation, then strong is not difficult to overcome the administrative inertia.
worth mentioning is that the "price earnings ratio," included in the performance evaluation, two points should be noted in the operation:
First, the share price in the performance evaluation ratio must be high. If this ratio is not high, I am afraid not much binding for the local officials. Because, this way, officials in the results of price regulation is no big deal on the loss of a fraction, the loss can be Diwai Tsutsumiuchi complement, other items, such as by raising the GDP, fixed asset investment performance, the overall performance can easily be pulled.
housing issue concerns the fundamental rights of citizens, should become one of the most critical performance indicators, especially in the high prices have been endangering the safe operation of the economy has become the greatest threat to people in the immediate sense of happiness, even on ineffective regulation of prices a holder of the officials, but also not outrageous. The "price earnings ratio," high places, severe accountability, local governments and their officials to cancel all the comments of the first qualification, responsible officials shall be demoted, dismissed or not promoted within a few years ... ... clear goals under the accountability system , high prices pushed officials dare?
Second, the "price earnings ratio" beware of the local officials of fraud examination. All along, although the price regulation is not explicitly linked with the performance, but taking into account public opinion and the higher the pressure on local governments in housing prices still common frauds. Not long ago, issued by the Office of Housing and Urban Gansu Lanzhou double the price difference between the market price, is a typical example. And if house prices is also related to his official status, local officials fear more difficult to curb fraud impulse.
resolve fraud problems, can only rely on information disclosure. For example, local housing data released by the Government, it should not be just a simple conclusion, the data for each specific source is, its calculation method, etc., all of the information behind the data rates should be unreservedly to the public , so, even if the local governments to create a beautiful deception superior data, but it could not pass in any case the public this level.
□ Han Han (media people)
