China Daily

text / Qiu Ruixian from at 8:20 p.m. on the July 1 and yesterday, he founded the first Chinese Web site's popular science writer, academic crackdown series in their own micro-Fang Bo (http://t.sina.com. cn / fangzhouzi) on the issue of 21 records, to spearhead the Group President and Chief of Xinhua are CEO, the famous "workers" Jun Tang.

in this series of micro-Bo, the Fang from the Tang Jun in "My success can be replicated," a book revealed the personal degree, school and work experience, put forward a number of questions, and produce part of the verification of evidence, that "Jun Tang's 'California Institute of Technology doctorate' is false, is not how should we follow the replication of false?"

as of this writing, the micro-Bo Fang and Jun Tang (http://t.sina.com.cn/tangjun), the friends discussed the incident is still in progress. However, as was challenged party, the past few days have updated micro-Bo Tang Jun has never made any positive response to this "micro-Bo" earthquake for the time being rather than as a one-man show series.

map from the Internet

challenged side:

anonymous last year, is emerging

science writer Bo Fang opening of micro- , declared that "Fang is not interested in listening to any advice on manners were not welcome Chinese medicine, feng shui, I Ching, Chinese culture and various pseudo-scientific 'master' and followers 'attention'." In the July 1 micro-Bo before he released the record, the majority of published science or common sense to answer a variety of users of the popular science issues.

but he apparently did not forget their own from the beginning of 2000, "Academic fake" target. At 8:20 p.m. on the July 1, Fang Bo, on the micro suddenly issued a reply to the netizen "Sagan" micro-Bo: "Jun Tang's 'California Institute of Technology doctorate' is false, is not want us to follow Copy to fraud? "

and through access to relevant news reports found that as early as last April 21, there is news that an anonymous person in the famous fake Fang's" Threads "website post, questioned "the first professional manager," Tang Jun PhD a fake. At that time, he signed on to Albert's in the "Threads" website posting said that he was from 1991 to 1996, California Institute of Technology study, had never heard of Jun Tang. Subsequently, Fang said in the posts, in the United States Jun Tang dissertation database of finding the "dissertation."

more than a year later, Jun Tang Fang once again raised questions about the qualifications. In the event that he issued after the first micro-Bo, have friends that ask him what evidence. Therefore, only separated by 50 minutes after Fang issued a second micro-Bo, said there are two key evidence, "I, Computer Science Department, California Institute of Technology alumni list is not the person. II, American universities can not find the doctoral dissertation database people's paper. "He then said under check," California Institute of Technology in 2001, not before the Chinese won a Ph.D. in computer. until now no name is Tang's too. "

It is understood that , in the Tang Jun's "My success can be replicated," a book, the second last paragraph of s 56 wrote: "do a second company, I almost dropped out of school. but with the application of speech recognition research results, I finally got the California Institute of Technology Ph.D. in computer science. "

comic" fired ":

degree, work papers are subject to the question

July 1 issue of this series of micro-Fang Bo, immediately sparked widespread concern in users, many sites on the headline position quickly reprint. That night, Fang admitted that he did not read the book Tang Jun, is because "someone reported that I had to check it."

He pointed out that "America's elite universities not prestigious universities in China will not allow you to 'working for Ph.D. study', by fool a 'success' or a PhD thesis can be obtained, it is sold Diploma Yejitaixue practice. "Therefore, if finding out the names and thesis, Jun Tang can not get a doctorate in school.

Fang attention the incident got out of hand. At 4:27 on the 2 July, he even noticed that Jun Tang to study in detail of the book is, "Tang Jun," My success can be replicated, "said he to work for Microsoft in 1994 when the first e-mail was very fresh. I, as a student, Department of Biochemistry, 1992, began using e-mail, he, as 'California Institute of Technology computer science Ph.D.' actually have not used e-mail? "

Since then, he quickly Jun Tang has turned its attention to other experiences - the book said, "He first came to the United States in the 90's, several companies run by the invention, made money by selling the patent and the attention caused by Microsoft. but check the U.S. Patent Office since 1976 Full-text patent database before 1999 who do not call Jun Tang won the patent. Jun Tang to Microsoft's use of the name or Jun Tang, less likely to apply for patent by another name. "

for Tang Jun In his book said he had received "emoticons Camera" and "Kara OK scoring" patent, after check Fang said, has a special owner, and are all non-Jun Tang. As for the claim in the United States organized Tang Jun, "U.S. first immigration law firm," opened in 5 months in the Los Angeles immigration consulting industry discharged to the first, he was the only lawyer in the firm; Fang question: " Jun Tang has no law degree, and no knowledge of U.S. law (the law books while claiming to take the side bite case), what qualifications an attorney handling the case on behalf of others? he revealed the secret that dare not see clients afraid, not afraid of meeting an immigration officer revealed the secret? "

be challenged by:

remain silent on the matter

As of press time, Fang questioned on Jun Tang has not stopped. Published in the latest micro-Bo in the book of the Tang Jun said he founded several companies in the United States, Fang expressed by check revealed that Tang Jun is not the registered person.

four consecutive days a couple of 10 micro-Bo, Fang seems determined to attack the Tang Jun's "degree door," the. Issued a challenge in his first start micro-Bo, users have begun to micro-Jun Tang Bo leave comments, proposed to Jun Tang to answer questions.

the past few days, journalists try to contact me on the matter respond to Tang Jun, but without success. Miss Li said his secretary, "Fang the person in question is a paranoid, he wrote them to hype themselves, we are not prepared to respond, because people respond to this question, let us also look very boring!"

far, remained silent on the matter I Jun Tang. The reporters found that while from July 1 to yesterday during the Tang Jun has been on all the activities in the micro-Bo, and issued nearly 10 records, but it looks like he completely ignored the comic Fang fire - Jun Tang recent days in micro-Bo, most of all about him watching "World Cup" feel.

only a reference to a media interview as microblogging, is the evening of July 3 issued. Tang Jun said, "I just interviewed by the media what is now the most enjoy: freedom to live and work, what is most worried about: What do not worry, most care about is: if it rains tomorrow (rain can not play) ... ... "But this record does not seem to finish, behind some of the statements can not be displayed.

in micro-Bo Tang Jun, the few 10 users responded Fang made him doubt the message, but so far none of Jun Tang to be ignored.

friends big debate:

ability and education more important?

Although Tang Jun's "degree" incident, is still one of the questions that only Fang, already aroused the concern of a large number of users. "Important in the end a person's qualifications or ability important? Jun Tang academic fraud in the end whether the impact of his achievements?" Many users have been micro-Bo Fang and Tang Jun, the conduct of the war of words in the great debate.

Sun Xiaokun: qualifications important? Like to see the achievements of the Tang Dynasty, it brought something to prove worthy of showing off or anything?

greedy big dog: even if others are not, Dr, his achievement is not free a person can achieve. He had some success with his hit, on what basis you say that he, he realized his own value.

Tongan brick home: I "academic fraud" without any evaluation of this act, has no intention at the moral level of "academic fraud" in nature. I think at this moment, most people just want to know an objective answer: Tang Jun degree on whether the fraud? Please answer yes or no.

caution tongue: how important education is important to practice success, education higher, there is no practical results, and can only be on paper for a class.

Rye 1975: relationship between academic fraud if a person's integrity, are basic moral bottom line! Hope that the positive Fang Tang Jun doubts come up with a real diploma to take a look at an eye-opener! Not to know if it is true, false and not true! Only people will dodge avoid a guilty conscience!